Why Education Is The Key To 'The American Dream'
The New York Times
"The median earnings for prime-age (25-64) working men have declined slightly from 1970 to 2010, falling by 4 percent after adjusting for inflation," write economists Michael Greenstone and Adam Looney.
On the Economix blog, economists Michael Greenstone and Adam Looney paint a depressing picture about our paychecks:
Adjusted for inflation, wages for American men are essentially the same as they were in 1970, a phenomenon known as “wage stagnation.” Wages for women have risen since the ’70s, but there are early signs that even their wages are beginning to level off, Greenstone and Looney say.
So, what’s the key to turning this trend around? Greenstone and Looney’s answer:
Among the most robust findings in economics is that education reduces unemployment and increases earnings. But even with the remarkable capacity for education to produce growth, the rate of educational attainment in the United States has slowed, especially for men.
The share of men 25 to 34 with a college degree, for example, has barely increased over the last 30 years. (The trends are much better for women.) The United States, once the world leader in educational attainment, has been surpassed by many countries.
Strengthening our K-12 education system and increasing college-completion rates are, therefore, imperative to improving living standards for future generations. It is also clear that changes in the global economy that generate vast opportunities for the American economy have created difficulties for many Americans; the continued pursuit of pro-growth policies will require the identification of policies that help these workers to remain active participants in the economy. These are difficult tasks, but the last four decades demonstrate that the stakes are high. Our children’s living standards are at risk, and with them the American Dream that each generation can do better than the previous one.Related
Posts
- The New Achievement Gap? The Link Between Education & Unemployment
- Why We Should Worry About A Bubble In Student Loans — Even If It Doesn’t Exist
- Want More Students To Graduate? Don’t Tell Them To Go To College, Bennett Says
- Why Your College Major Matters When You Lose Your Job
- Gallup Poll Indicates College Graduates Are More Likely To Be Employed Full-Time
Add this to the litany of “education–matters…-no–really–trust–us” posts we’ve featured here on StateImpact — all of which offer varying visions for “strengthening our K-12 education system and increasing college-completion rates.”
Some advocate for more spending on higher education. Others say new academic standards are the key. Still others say we should focus on getting more people through college — a task that could become difficult as the nation’s student debt burden grows.
Filling Indiana’s ‘Skills Gap’
In Indiana, gubernatorial candidates Mike Pence and John Gregg have spent much of the campaign talking about increasing opportunities for career and technical education.
“Talking to employers large and small in Indiana, I’ve heard that there are jobs available but they can’t find workers to fill them… It’s what economists call a skills gap in Indiana,” Pence, a Republican, told StateImpact earlier this month.
Pence has turned vocational education into a signature campaign issue, saying he would create regional “Indiana Works Councils” to bring together schools with businesses in different regions of the state to create partnerships to benefit students — which will, Pence hopes, lead to job opportunities for students after they graduate.
Gregg, a Democrat, says programs supporting students and workers seeking job skills have been the victim of broader cuts to state education funding.
“Our job opportunities in this state are in agriculture, advanced manufacturing, logistics, life sciences, energy — all those job opportunities don’t mean anything if we don’t have a well-qualified and educated workforce,” Gregg told StateImpact.
Do you think Gregg’s and Pence’s stances are going to help fill Indiana’s “skills gap”? Or that policies like theirs can help improve stagnant wages?