Education, From The Capitol To The Classroom

Department of Education Report: 1 In 8 Borrowers Defaulted On Student Loans

David McNew / Getty Images

Demonstrators in Los Angeles protest the rising cost of higher education on Sept. 22, 2012. According to the U.S. Department of Education, more than 13 percent of borrowers who began paying off their student loans in 2009 had defaulted on payments three years later.

Indiana’s three-year student loan default rate is slightly lower than the national average, according to data from the U.S. Department of Education.

About 12.9 percent of Indiana borrowers who began repayment in 2009 defaulted on their loans, compared to 13.4 percent nationally. That’s slightly lower than last year’s 13.8 percent. From Inside Higher Ed:

The drop could indicate that a smaller proportion of students are defaulting, or that colleges, conscious that the three-year rates matter more this year than last, have been more proactive about pushing students who could not repay into deferment or forbearance, programs that allow students to postpone repayment without counting them as defaulters. The rising two-year rate, which is now at its highest level since 1996, was largely attributed to the still-struggling economy.

The two-year default rate is up from 8.8 to 9.1 percent. That’s for borrowers who began repayment in 2010. The Department of Education is transitioning to the use of three-year rates to determine the college’s eligibility for federal financial aid.

Thirty states and the District of Columbia had lower three-year default rates than Indiana. Arizona had the highest percent of borrowers in default at 22.9 percent while North Dakota had the lowest at 5.1 percent.

Students who borrowed to attend for-profit schools are defaulting at the highest rates — more than one in five. For public colleges, the default rate is 11 percent. It’s 7.5 percent at private, not-for-profit colleges.

But over at The Quick & The Ed, Thomas Dawson argues the data doesn’t tell us enough about the type of borrower defaulting on student loans:

Further analysis of this data is limited to comparisons of default rates across sectors.  Should it come as a surprise that the default rate for a community college in Michigan is worse than Amherst College? Probably not, but even comparing different community colleges in Michigan to extend the analogy is limited.

That’s because the Department does not release loan default rates broken down by student demographics. If we want to know if default rates are related to Pell grant status or the type of major or course of study a student pursued, that, too, is not released by the Department as part of its loan default analysis. If Latino students, who are more debt averse (according to studies by the Institute for Higher Education Policy and Excellencia), default at greater rates, you won’t learn that from the Department’s analysis. Similarly, if older students are more likely to avoid default than younger students, that too is not revealed.

Here’s why that information is needed: Dawson writes that until we have a better idea of which borrowers are struggling to repay their loans, it’s hard to nail down a solution to the problem of excessive student debt. (Keep in mind that just because a student borrowed doesn’t mean they ended up with a degree.) With better information, he argues, higher education can develop policies that target the most at-risk students.


  • perspective2

    Senior management at University of California Berkeley drives Californians into deep debt.

    public’s University of California harvests family savings, Alumni donations, supporter’s
    money and taxes. Cal. ranked #1 public university total academic cost (resident)
    as a result of the Provost’s, Chancellor’s ‘charge resident’s higher tuition’. UCB
    tuition is rising faster than other universities.

    Cal ranked # 2 nationally
    in faculty earning potential. Spending on salaries increased 29% in last six
    years. Believe it: Harvard College less costly.

    University of
    California negates promise of equality of opportunity: access, affordability. Self-absorbed
    Provost Breslauer Chancellor Birgeneau are outspoken on ‘charging residents much
    higher’ tuition

    Breslauer Birgeneau like
    to blame the politicians, since they stopped giving them their entitled
    funding. The ‘charge instate students higher tuition’ skyrocketed fees by an
    average 14% per year from 2006 to 2011 academic years. If they had allowed fees
    to raise at the same rate of inflation over past 10 years fees would still be
    in reach of middle income students. Breslauer Birgeneau increase disparities in
    higher education, defeat the promise of equality of opportunity, and create a
    less-educated work force.

    Additional state tax funding
    must sunset. The sluggish economy, 10% unemployment devastates family savings. Simply
    asking for more taxes (Prop 30, 32) to spend on self-absorbed Cal. leadership, inefficient
    higher education practices, over-the-top salaries, lavish bonuses, is not the

    UCB is to maximize access to the widest number of residence at a reasonable
    cost. Birgeneau Breslauer’s ‘charge Californians higher tuition’ denies middle
    income families the transformative value of Cal.

    The California dream:
    keep it alive and well. Fire Provost George W Breslauer. Birgeneau resigned. Cal. leadership must
    accept responsibility for failing Californians.

    UC Board of Regents Calif.
    State Senators, Assembly members.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »