Give Now

Earth Eats: Real Food, Green Living

Study: Gains From Berkeley Soda Tax Smaller Than Expected

A new study reveals that a tax on sugary drinks implemented in Berkeley, California has increased soda prices much less than expected.

Berkeley's soda tax raised prices for consumers by only half as much as expected.

Pop Goes the Tax

Taxing soda is a key strategy for health advocates to reduce consumption of sugary drinks and tackle obesity. The idea is that retailers would pass the extra cost to consumers, who would drink less because of the increased price.

The tactic worked like a charm in Mexico, where a national 10 percent soda tax in 2013 decreased sales by as much as 12 percent.

Previous studies of beverage taxes in Mexico, Denmark and France showed that prices increased by the full amount of the tax.

But what if stores don’t increase soda prices?

Two economists, John Cawley at Cornell University and David Frisvold of the University of Iowa, compared soda prices in Berkeley, which imposed a 1-cent-per-ounce tax this spring, to prices in San Francisco, where a similar beverage tax failed to pass.

The results, published in the National Bureau of Economic Research, showed that prices rose by less than half of the tax amount in Berkeley. Only 22 percent of the tax was passed on to consumers for Coke and Pepsi.

Flat Effect

So why isn’t the tax working as well as it did in places like Mexico?

For one thing, the Berkeley tax only affects a small area that is surrounded by stores where the tax is not in effect.

“The stores may not be increasing their prices by as much as they otherwise would have because they’re worried that’s going to decrease their sales significantly when nearby stores are offering the same products for much cheaper,” David Frisvold said.

He said the effect could have been very different if California had imposed a statewide tax, though that kind of speculation is outside the wheelhouse of this study.

Glass Half Empty

Reaction to results of the tax has been mixed, with health advocates focusing on $116,000 in the revenue raised during a one-month period, and the beverage industry pointing to the new study as a big “we told you so” aimed at policymakers.

Industry news site BeverageDaily used section headings like “Sin Tax Not Working,” and conservative news site Daily Caller covered the results as evidence of “Berkeley’s Soda Tax Fail.”

“It’s funny how people can respond to results in such a varied fashion,” Frisvold said. “It’s interesting to see the emotion that has been expressed related to what I view as objective analysis of numbers.”

The study’s authors do not offer policy recommendations based on the research, but state that the results do not mean the idea of soda taxes should be dismissed.

“There is an economic rationale for taxes when consumption of the good imposes negative externalities, and obesity costs taxpayers billions each year in medical care costs in the U.S.,” John Cawley said in a Cornell news release.

Big Spenders

The study follows recent news that Coca Cola spent millions of dollars to back research suggesting that lack of exercise is a greater factor than diet in preventing obesity.

The New York Times published an editorial blasting its support for nonprofit Global Energy Balance Network (GEBN) and for paying bloggers to suggest drinking a mini can of Coke as a snack food.

GEBN states on its website that it does not “promote physical activity at the expense of diet.”

The Center for Science in the Public Interest recently found that Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and the American Beverage Association have spent at least $106 million to crush public health initiatives since 2009.

In the shadow of these controversies, Frisvold was careful to point out that the beverage industry had no hand in supporting the team’s research on Berkeley’s soda tax.

Read More:

  • New Research Shows A Flaw In The Plan To Tax Soda Out Of Existence (Grist)
  • Berkeley’s Soda Tax Does A Slow Fizzle (Futurity)
  • Coca-Cola Funds Scientists Who Shift Blame for Obesity Away From Bad Diets (New York Times)
Chad Bouchard

Chad Bouchard is a veteran reporter and WFIU alum who has covered wild and wooly beats from Indonesia to Capitol Hill. His radio work has aired on NPR, PRI and Voice of America, and his writing has appeared in The Sunday Telegraph and Scientific American’s health magazine, Lives. He has also spent a lifetime gardening, foraging and eating weird stuff.

View all posts by this author »

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Earth Eats:

Support For Indiana Public Media Comes From

About Earth Eats

Search Earth Eats

Earth Eats on Twitter

Earth Eats on Flickr

Harvest Public Media