Indiana

Education, From The Capitol To The Classroom

A New Wave Of Transforming Schools: The Transformation Zone

IDOE Director of Legislative Affairs John Barnes, IPS Superintendent Louis Ferebee and State Board of Education member Brad Oliver discuss the new plan for failing schools at the BDG Legislative Conference.

Rachel Morello/StateImpact Indiana

Sen. Carlin Yoder (R-Middlebury), IPS Superintendent Louis Ferebee and State Board of Education member Brad Oliver discuss the new plan for failing schools at the BDG Legislative Conference.

One of the biggest accomplishments from Wednesday’s State Board of Education meeting was a recommendation from the board to the governor and legislature regarding turnaround efforts for failing schools.

The board accepted the recommendation from its turnaround committee to overhaul the way the state intervenes in failing schools.

The recommendation includes a few big changes. First, the board will now intervene after four consecutive years of receiving a D or F, rather than six years of consecutive Fs.

The recommendation was approved with a 9-2 vote, with Cari Whicker and state superintendent Glenda Ritz voting against it, citing issues with certain parts of the plan. 

Board member Brad Oliver says the reason he voted for the changes so failing schools don’t get stuck in a pattern of low performance.

“Part of that’s driven out of an ethical obligation to our most struggling learners,” Oliver said.

Turnaround zones will become the new model for improving these schools, rather than finding outside companies to come in and try and work cohesively with a district. This model is currently being used in Evansville with a lot of success, and the board approved the use of this model for Indianapolis Public Schools, which has struggled to make progress under the oversight of lead partners.

IPS Superintendent Louis Ferebee spoke about this opportunity at the BDG Legislative Conference Thursday, saying he expects IPS to make better improvement without a lead partner.

“I think it’s a different way of thinking that’s not ‘command and demand’ and mandate your way into improvement but truly allowing the flexibility and autonomy for the school district to improve student outcomes,” Ferebee said.

One part of the recommendation that Ritz disagreed with is their suggestion to create a group within the board to oversee the efforts of turnaround schools. She says the DOE, which she is in charge of, already has a group conducting this oversight, so it seems to be another instance of the board and Ritz disagreeing over duties.

The recommendation will now go to the legislature and governor for approval, but it probably won’t face much backlash as Governor Pence outlined similar ideas in his legislative agenda, released Thursday.

Comments

  • Mouse Rat

    Look at all the broken arms patting themselves on the back!

    Is this an article or a press release?

    The problem with education right now is the holier than thou need to wrest control from localities and stuff it up a tight pipe to states and federal geniuses.

    The whole thing creates an illusion that the ruling elite might care about educating their future servants.

    You want to fix broken schools? Let the localities keep the money they raise for education and then let them do their best with what they have. If you want to send them a little extra to level the playing field, fine; just send it no strings attached.

  • Terry Daugherty

    “A lot of success”, I saw a few indicators, but not many. The one about more students within 20 points of passing ISTEP, reminds me of a study I saw that said it saw very few students pass the test if they were over 15 points of passing it the year before.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education