Indiana

Education, From The Capitol To The Classroom

Mailbag: Controversial Charter Schools And Achievement Gaps

Our article about the controversy surrounding charter schools created some controversy of it’s own. Reader inteach expressed concerns about the non-unionized nature of many charter schools.

Teachers are wary of charters for three reasons. First, they see them draining money and the best students away from traditional public schools.

Second, they see the working conditions in charters as a step backwards…longer hours, less protections, lower pay, no collective bargaining, etc. These are issues teachers fought against for years, only to see them as making a return under the guise of reform.

Third, teachers view education as an essential public service, one that is too important to hand over to the private sector. Profits and kids don’t mix.

Eduction Week featured an article not too long ago which explored a similar issue, from the opposite perspective.  Charter school teacher Marilyn Rhames describes the experience of dining with the head of Chicago’s teachers union.

When a friend of mine at dinner asked her how Lewis envisioned charter and district schools working together, she responded, “I want to unionize charter schools.” That’s when my tendency to apply reverse logic kicked in. I thought, If the teachers’ union president started her own charter school, what kind of school would it be? She actually told us that she once wrote a proposal to start a school but it didn’t go anywhere.

Rhames seems to indicate that charter school teachers may not be enthusiastic about the idea of unionizing.

Guest 2 commented on another story about how efforts to close achievement gaps may ignore students performing at the highest level.  This reader raises fundamental questions about how schools are evaluated.

Of course, I happen to think that using ANY type of criteria to attempt to “compare” one school in this state against another school is ridiculous, unless you include a metric that allows schools to be compared only against other schools with similar student populations.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett has long argued that home conditions shouldn’t matter when it comes to how well a school performs.  This has caused school officials in districts which have not performed well on state standards to accuse the state of constantly changing its benchmarks.

Comments

  • Objective Hoosier

    Tony Bennett’s comment that “home conditions shouldn’t matter when it comes to how well a school performs” is patently absurd. Students who live in a home where the parents or guardians have no interest in the child’s education or do not have the academic ability to help their children with studies have a very difficult challenge maintaining their grades compared to students who have parents who are capable of assisting their children.
    Tony Bennett is nothing more than a puppet for Mitch Daniels and will say anything that will further the republican agenda.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education