Give Now

Delays, Closings and Severe Weather - View All Alerts and Updates

Legislative Committee Considers Changes To Civil Forfeiture Law


Photo: Steve Burns

Phil Boots testifies during a committee hearing on civil forfeiture.

A legislative study committee is considering whether Indiana should make changes to its laws that allow police to seize the personal property involved in a suspected crime. Some argue the burden of proof for civil forfeiture should be higher.

State Sen. Phil Boots, R-Crawfordsville, proposed a bill during this year’s legislative session that would have required a criminal conviction in order for police to seize any personal property.

“I think if you’re going to take somebody’s property, it ought to be clear and convincing evidence,” Boots says. “You use that in every other criminal area, I believe.”

Boots says he’s heard from constituents who’ve lost money or property as a result of the law. He says one of the issues arises when property is confiscated that didn’t belong to the suspect in a crime. For example, Boots says one of his constituents bought his daughter a car, which police claimed her boyfriend used to commit a crime.

“Her boyfriend used it to commit prescription fraud, police seized the car, never charged the individual, never charged the girl, kept the car for over a year,” Boots says. “And, then they said finally you can come and get it, the impound fees were more than the car was worth.”

But Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry says he thinks the state’s civil forfeiture laws are adequate.

“There are circumstances where we believe seizure and forfeiture is appropriate where there’s never going to be a criminal conviction,” Curry says.

That can happen when people are trying to send drug money through the mail. Curry says they sometimes use a fake address as the destination, so it’s hard to track the suspects down.

There are several lawsuits pending that challenge Indiana’s current civil forfeiture statute, including one in Marion County. The non-profit Institute for Justice filed a lawsuit against the city of Indianapolis and Marion County prosecutor’s office last year claiming the Indianapolis police is “diverting millions of dollars of civil-forfeiture proceeds for its own benefit.”

Indiana law requires any proceeds from civil forfeitures be deposited into the state’s common school fund, but allows police and prosecutors to deduct law enforcement costs first. The lawsuit claims Indianapolis police and the Marion County prosecutor’s office haven’t sent any proceeds to the common school fund over the past five years.

Curry says the way proceeds from civil forfeitures are distributed should be changed. He says one-third of the proceeds should go to the prosecutor, 85 percent of the remaining amount should go to law enforcement and the other 15 percent should be deposited to the common school fund.

Want to contact your legislators about an issue that matters to you? Find out how to contact your senators and member of Congress here.

  • lastcamp2

    What? The police are keeping the money they confiscate? Illegally? Say it isn’t so!
    But of course it is so. Doesn’t that make the cops robbers? Doesn’t it bring into question their true motives, including self-interest, when they zealously grab everything they can get their hands on?
    Well, how else are we going to fund the police state? Police are already likely to be the most powerful political bloc in the state. But nobody seems to notice. All they see is the police giving kids teddy bears and having bake sales to support three-headed orphans. And of course putting their lives on the line every day, even though there are numerous occupations more hazardous than police work.
    When was the last time you saw a tree trimmer get an award for bravery?

  • Eric Stevens

    The Indiana Law regarding forfeitures requires all proceeds go to the School Fund. There is nothing written in law that allows money to be diverted elsewhere. There was even an Indiana Supreme Court Opinion written on the matter that reprimanded a certain prosecutor for not complying with said law. The Indiana Attorney General would like to argue that, since no court has actually ruled against that practice in court, and only an opinion exists, the Indiana Supreme Court does not believe in the legitimacy of said law and refuses to enforce it. We need the TRUTH.

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Indiana Public Media News:

Support For Indiana Public Media Comes From

Search News

Stay Connected

RSS e-mail itunes Facebook Twitter Flickr YouTube

Follow us on Twitter

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Indiana Public Media News:

Recent Stories

Recent Videos

Find Us on Facebook