Give Now

HJR-3 Heads To Indiana Senate After Passing House

The resolution that would amend the constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman passed the House today 57-40.

Bosma

Photo: Indiana Public Media

Speaker Brian Bosma says he supports the second sentence of HJR-3 and the companion bill, House Bill 1153, answers the questions it raises.

The House of Representatives approved the amended version of HJR-3, the proposed constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage.

The House voted Monday to alter HJR-3, taking out the measure’s controversial second sentence banning civil unions.  That version of the amendment passed the House by a comfortable margin today, 57-40. The change also restarts the ratification process, potentially putting it on the ballot in 2016, instead of this fall.

House Minority Leader Scott Pelath says simply removing the second sentence isn’t enough.

“Fact is, we have not dismantled this bomb,” he says. “We’ve simply placed a longer fuse on it before it detonates in all of our faces.”

Rep. Eric Turner, R-Cicero, the measure’s author, says even without the second sentence, HJR-3 is necessary to protect the state’s existing statute defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

“We know from experience that states without constitutional protection run the risk of a state court changing the will of the people, the will of the legislature,” he says.

Rep. Woody Burton, R-Whiteland, says HJR-3’s opponents got enough when the second sentence was removed.

“Where do we say it’s time to draw the line in the sand and say, now look, these people want to live a life style?” he says. “This is their right. It’s not my job to judge them; my faith tells me that somebody else higher up’s going to judge people other than me so I don’t pass judgment on anybody. But I do say that there’s some times when they’re trying to force some type of an object on us, on everybody else, that the people have a right to speak.”

But  Rep. Matt Pierce says, D-Bloomington, lawmakers weren’t elected to be a conveyor belt for constitutional amendments.

“We are given the job not of saying, ‘Here’s the choice for you to make, people.’  Our job is to say, ‘We think the constitution is worthy of being amended in this way,’” he says.

The amended version of HJR-3 now heads to the Senate, where the second sentence could be reinserted.

HJR3 Roll Call by Indiana Public Media News

Brandon Smith, IPBS

Brandon Smith, IPBS has previously worked as a reporter and anchor for KBIA Radio in Columbia, MO, and at WSPY Radio in Plano, IL as a show host, reporter, producer and anchor. Brandon graduated from the University of Missouri-Columbia with a Bachelor of Journalism in 2010, with minors in political science and history. He was born and raised in Chicago.

View all posts by this author »

  • Sparksinky

    “But I do say that there’s some times when they’re trying to force some
    type of an object on us, on everybody else, that the people have a right to
    speak.”
    What object?

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Indiana Public Media News:

Support For Indiana Public Media Comes From

Search News

Stay Connected

RSS e-mail itunes Facebook Twitter Flickr YouTube

Follow us on Twitter

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Indiana Public Media News:

Recent Politics Stories

Recent Videos

Find Us on Facebook