Court Clarifies Harassment Rulings Using Ball State Case

Chicago's Seventh Circuit Court will use a harassment case filed against Ball State to clarify it's rulings on workplace harassment.

Gavel

Photo: Jashin Lin (WFIU/WTIU News)

Courts have disagreed on the definition of a supervisor.

The U.S. Supreme Court will use a lawsuit against Ball State to clarify its rulings on workplace harassment.

The Court ruled in a pair of 1998 decisions that employers can be liable for harassment if they‘re negligent in responding to the situation. But they‘re automatically liable if the harasser is a supervisor. Since then, though, lower courts have disagreed on the definition of a supervisor.

When a Ball State catering assistant accused a fellow kitchen worker of menacing her physically and using racial slurs, a federal judge and the Chicago-based Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected her claims against the university because her co-worker had no power to hire or fire anyone

Network Indiana

Network Indiana Indiana's Only Audio News Network. Network Indiana is dedicated to providing the state of Indiana important and useful information.

View all posts by this author »

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Indiana Public Media News:

Support For Indiana Public Media Comes From

Search News

Stay Connected

RSS e-mail itunes Facebook Twitter Flickr YouTube

Follow us on Twitter

What is RSS? RSS makes it possible to subscribe to a website's updates instead of visiting it by delivering new posts to your RSS reader automatically. Choose to receive some or all of the updates from Indiana Public Media News:

Recent Stories

Recent Videos

Find Us on Facebook